200,000 Dead is Better than 20,000 Dead; German Leader declares Torture a Good Thing
"Let's take the military option off the table. We have seen it doesn't work," Mr Schroeder told Social Democrats at the rally in Hanover, to rapturous applause from the crowd.
http://www.pakistantimes.net/2005/08/14/top7.htm
The suffering the Angloamerican invasion of Iraq has ended has to be seen to be believed.
http://www.shianews.com/hi/articles/politics/0000374.php
Saddam Hussein's SS (why not use the historical term) killed thousands, no, tens of thousands. I have not seen such images since I read a book "The Yellow Star" which my parents have an early copy of.
http://www.buch.de/buch/01538/895_der_gelbe_stern.html
Iraq's history during Saddam's reign is now well-documented.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Saddam%27s_Iraq
There is no excuse for not knowing about it and I cannot see how downplaying Saddam's crimes or declining to mention them is different from holocaust denial (which is illegal in Germany).
The Iraq Body Count Web site is a left wing publication giving the numbers of victims of the invasion as roughly 27,000.
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/
They count all victims since the invasion as victims of the invasion, regardless of who or what killed them and why. Their point is that the invasion was a humanitarian disaster. They so obviously ignore the pre-invasion history, it's not even ironic. Holding the position this Web site holds in quite legal in Germany, because Arab fascists appear to enjoy a special status German fascists do not enjoy. Personally, I don't care what nationality my opressor has. And it also doesn't matter whether the victims are Jewish or Kurds or Shi'ite Arabs. But the left sees a difference.
I am a German citizen and even though I don't live in Germany any more, I am eligible to vote in the upcoming elections. I still have an address in Berlin, but if I didn't, I would be wondering how they determine in which constituency my vote should count. Either way, the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has called for an early election. He is now likely to be replaced as chancellor by the conservative Angela Merkel (from the east, a woman, with a degree in science).
Six parties are poised to send MPs to the federal parliament: Gerhard Schroeder's own Social Democrats (SPD), his coalition partner, the Green party (B90, don't ask), the conservative Christian Democrats (CDU), the Bavarian Christian Democrats (CSU), the Liberal Democrats (FDP), and a new left wing party formed of the east German socialists and west German Social Democrat dissidents (PDS). The latter advocate high minimum wages and a 32-hour week mandated by law.
I grew up in a Social Democrat/Liberal Democrat family. I have since become a neo-conservative in many ways.
Now the gist of this rant is that I cannot vote for Gerhard Schroeder or vote for any party that might possibly help him in any way.
A man who considers free elections and a vast reduction in deaths and torture victims to be evidence that something didn't work, cannot be a good leader.
I do not hold it against Schroeder that he opposed the invasion. It was his privilege and his right. But to claim that the invasion didn't work, in the face of evidence from Iraq now and Iraq then is, to me, the moral equivalent of holocaust denial.