A Leauki's Writings
Published on March 23, 2010 By Leauki In War on Terror

This is something Americans should understand:

Hezbollah’s reaction to Israel’s plan to build 1,600 apartments in a Jewish neighborhood in East Jerusalem might help President Barack Obama understand something that has so far eluded him: the Syrian-Iranian-Hamas-Hezbollah resistance bloc will not allow him to appease it.

“The scheme is yet another part of a Judaization campaign,” Hezbollah said in a statement quoted by the Tehran Times, “that targets the holy city of al-Quds [Jerusalem] and a provocation of Muslim feeling.” If Obama expected a little appreciation from Israel’s enemies for making the same point with more diplomatic finesse, he was mistaken. “The Zionist plan to construct hundreds of homes in al-Quds,” Hezbollah continued, “truly shows American cover to it.”

...

A couple of years ago Hezbollah stretched a banner across an overpass near Lebanon’s international airport that said, in English, “All our catastrophes come from America.” Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah would have an awfully hard time climbing down from that high a tree even if his Iranian masters would let him — and they won’t. They’ve been calling Israel the “Little Satan” and the U.S. the “Great Satan” since Jimmy Carter, of all people, was president.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/totten/262966

 

The point here is that in the eyes of Islamic fundamentalists, especially of the Shiite kind, America is the great satan while Israel (and Jews) are the little satan. Appeasing them won't work for the US because they won't cooperate with big evil against little evil.

From the same article:

They had every reason in the world to hate Saddam Hussein more than anyone else in the world. His army killed hundreds of thousands of Iranians in an eight-year war he started less than a year after Ayatollah Khomeini became Supreme Leader. (Israel, meanwhile, has never fought a war with Iran and hasn’t killed any Iranians.) Yet the United States earned no points whatsoever for taking out their most dangerous enemy and placing their Shia co-religionists in the saddle in Baghdad.

Remember this. During that war the US did support Saddam with intelligence (and Iran with arms), but it was Israel that destroyed Saddam's nuclear capabilities with Iranian support.

The Iranian regime and their lackeys do not hate Israel and appreciate American neutrality. They hate America and would appreciate Israel's surrender.

Hizbullah and Syria and other Iran-allied Arabs want Israel gone, but for the Iranian regime, there is no need to see Israel go. Without Israel, Arabs could unite against Iran and there would be NOTHING Iran could do to keep some Arabs on their side. The Iranian regime needs Israel, but it doesn't need the United States.

If Iran gets the bomb, who is to say that they will use it to destroy one of Islam's holiest sites (Jerusalem) rather than use it as a threatening tool against America and her Arab allies in the Gulf?

Chances are the first Iranian-sourced bomb shows up somewhere in the US and not in Israel at all.

They want Jews to be second-class citizens, as they are in Iran.

But they want Americans dead. And there has never been any doubt about that.

 


Comments
on Mar 23, 2010

...

on Mar 23, 2010

Chances are the first Iranian-sourced bomb shows up somewhere in the US and not in Israel at all.

Biden was planning on it.

on Mar 23, 2010

Biden was planning on it.

I am beginning to think that we are more likely to see a scenario where the Mossad saves the US from a terrorist nuke than one in which the US military saves Israel from an official Iranian nuke.

If Iran flattens Jerusalem, the Arabs will go nuts, first in celebration, then in anger when they realise that a stranger has just attacked their cousin.

 

on Mar 23, 2010

If Iran flattens Jerusalem, the Arabs will go nuts, first in celebration, then in anger when they realise that a stranger has just attacked their cousin.

I think they have to worry more about Tel Aviv, but I do agree with your first point on who saves whom.

on Mar 23, 2010

Tel Aviv

That would also affect the holy sites.

But then of course the Arabs would celebrate without interruption and western liberals would lament that Israeli militarism and imperialism have finally resulted in so many deaths, as they always predicted would happen.

 

on Mar 25, 2010

It's really stupid to call the USA "The Great Satan"

But then again, it's as stupid as to call Obama the Antichrist.

on Mar 25, 2010



It's really stupid to call the USA "The Great Satan"



Ya' think?




But then again, it's as stupid as to call Obama the Antichrist.



The problem is, the US are the "Great Satan". To Islamic fundamentalists the US represent everything that Israel represents and worse (and more of it).

This is not something the US can deal with by throwing them Israel and hoping that they will eat it first.

People who believe that women should be stoned for adultery (and for being raped) and that homosexuals should be executed are no friends of America. The sooner everybody gets that the better.

In the US women get stoned first, and THEN commit adultery.

on Mar 25, 2010

People who believe that women should be stoned for adultery (and for being raped) and that homosexuals should be executed are no friends of America. The sooner everybody gets that the better.

So Saudi Arabia is no friend of America?

Wo.. you taught me something valuable here.

on Mar 25, 2010

So Saudi Arabia is no friend of America?

Not really, no.

Friends wouldn't give quite as much money to terrorist groups that try to kill you.

 

Wo.. you taught me something valuable here.

You never suspected a thing?

 

on Mar 25, 2010

Not really, no.

Friends wouldn't give quite as much money to terrorist groups that try to kill you.

My mistake. Seemed to me like you did a lot to tighten political ties with them in the past 10 years.

Musthavebeen mistaken.

on Mar 25, 2010

My mistake. Seemed to me like you did a lot to tighten political ties with them in the past 10 years.

Musthavebeen mistaken.

You might indeed be mistaken.

I didn't do anything to tighten political ties with Saudi-Arabia, and nor would I want to. I do recognise that Saudi-Arabia generally forbids demonstrations against Israel and even speaks up when Hizbullah attacks, but apart from that there are few redeeming features in the "Kingdom".

Although things have been improving. Even Jews are now generally allowed to visit the country:

The official tourism website stated that Jews were banned from entering the country; however, it was not enforced in practice. On March 1, the Government removed this statement from the site replacing it with a statement regretting "any inconvenience this may have caused."

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41731.htm

(Let's spend one minute thinking what would happen if Israel banned any specific religious or ethnic group from visiting the country.)

US relations with Saudi-Arabia are quite good. Obama certainly wouldn't demand from Saudi-Arabia that it not build homes in Mecca or Medina.

(In case you didn't know: Saudi-Arabia annexed Mecca and Medina in 1926. The Kingdom of Jordan still wants them back.)

 

 

on Mar 25, 2010

My mistake. Seemed to me like you did a lot to tighten political ties with them in the past 10 years.

Just an FYI Cikomyr, Leauki is German and Lives in Ireland.  I would love for him to be American, but he seems content to drink Guiness instead of watered down beer.