A Leauki's Writings
Published on April 10, 2009 By Leauki In War on Terror

Many liberals use a different definition of “terrorism” than I do. For them the word is related to a cause, for me it’s related to a method.

Hence for them fighting for the cause they agree with, however inhuman and evil, is not “terrorism” regardless of the methods employed.

And for me attacking civilian targets to create fear (”terror”) is terrorism, regardless of what cause is being fought for.

There simply are not many Jews attacking schools and kindergardens in Arab countries because of real or perceived injustice or suffering experienced. But there are many Arabs who attack schools and kindergardens in Israel (and elsewhere). They are terrorists. They seek to create an atmosphere of terror in order to achieve their political goals (i.e. a Jew-free middle east or whatever their current propaganda officially says it is about).

They are too cowardly to oppose a real army and hence resort only to attacking children and unsuspecting civilians. They murder children in front of their parents, NOT because they expected the children to fire at them or because the children were used as human shields by militants firing at them but SOLELY because the children are too small to fight back and are thus an easy target for even the bravest of Arab terrorists.

And they are not very brave. They are only brave when their enemy is weaker. If the enemy turns out to be stronger, they whine and cry and ask the world for help against the evil Israelis, an enemy who at first seemed like an easy target and turned out to be far more difficult to “throw into the sea” than originally thought.

This is the terrorists’ battle strategy:

1. Try to murder children.
2. Wait for Israeli reaction.
3. Try to murder children until Israel reacts.
4. After Israel responds in kind, cry and whine and ask the world for money.
5. Use the money to buy weapons.
6. Repeat.

What heroes! If only they could take violence like they expect Jews to. But they are lesser men than the Israelis.

(Other typical targets of their heroic allies include unarmed black African tribes. Step 4 works so well as the world has lots of money because the world refuses to give that same money to the victims of genocide committed by the terrorists' allies in Darfur.)

 

 


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Apr 14, 2009

Leauki, you added the details and made the scenario longer. I like it. But it is not enough yet. As one of the back grounds, this should be included: Saito continues to enlarge his house over the border.

If Saito wants to claim that his family is the only righteous family in the region and that the last assault was just a legal defence, he should allow the police to investigate. The police says that they intend to inspect both Saito and Suzuki. You say that it will be a bad PR for Saito. But unfortunately, the last war has already been a bad PR for them. While the police says they will investigate both, that will be a worse PR if Saito never accepts it, I think.

 

I read the news that Mr. Netanyahu pledged for peace talk. I am following their course.

on Apr 14, 2009

Saito continues to enlarge his house over the border.

Only if the neighbour in question tried to murder him, plus he gave back the apartment he once took.

Note that all the other neighbours happily invade other apartments if they want to, for example the house of the Berber family from North-Africa, the house of Mr Kurdistan, and the homes of those nice black African families that Mr Sudanshi claims as his.

And while Mr Saito has an agreement with the people living in the apartment he took over, none of Mr Suzuki's large family even speak to the people whose apartments they took or allow them to speak.

Of the 200 apartments in the street, 99 are owned by Mr Suzuki's family, another 99 are controlled by his family and its inhabitants kept at slaves or murdered while only two flats are under the control of Mr Saito, one being the one he bought and the other being one of the places the Suzuki family used to shoot at Mr Saito's children, which Mr Saito says he will give back to the Suzuki family if they agree not to shoot any more.

 

If Saito wants to claim that his family is the only righteous family in the region and that the last assault was just a legal defence, he should allow the police to investigate.

I'm afraid at some point the police will have to investigate somebody else too. How can they solve crimes otherwise?

 

on Apr 14, 2009

you are aware that israel is actually withdrawing from territory all the time, right?

on Apr 14, 2009

you are aware that israel is actually withdrawing from territory all the time, right?

I am planning a series of posts about illegal occupations of other people's lands in the middle east, by size.

First posts will be about the "Arab" Maghreb (Berbers), Sudan (Nubians and related tribes), Kurdistan (Kurds), Assyria (Assyrians/Aramaeans), Hejaz (Hashemite clan, that's the kingdom the Saudis annexed in the 1920s and STILL haven't returned to the rightful owner). I'll grant them Egypt. I'll also cover Invaderland ("Palestine") which apparently belongs to the Arabs for some reason.

I want to create a campaign to end all occupations in the middle east starting with Kurdistan and Hejaz now.

End the occupation! Withdraw from Hejaz now! (I'll see if I can create a logo for the movement.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hejaz

Once Syria withdraws from Kurdistan and Saudi-Arabia from Hejaz we can talk about an Israeli withdrawal from ancient Jewish cities like Hevron and Jericho. But we need to verify first that the Arabs really believe in ending the occupation.

 

on Apr 14, 2009

When is the us withdrawing from its occupied territory? (look up the mexican american war... one of the spoils of which wasthe entire state of mexico).

Israel actually evecuated whole settlements, had to use tear gas and hordes of police for those who wouldn't leave by themselves... (and gave each person twice the value of their home in return, even those who were evacuated by force) and then surrendered those cities to the arabs... I don't think ever in the history of mankind did a nation willingly and forcibly removed its OWN citizens from a "conquered territory" to "give it back" to someone...

Israel conquered ALL the oil fields of egypt, gave it back for peace... huge stupid mistake... egypt would have collapsed without the oil and would not have been able to wage war against israel anyways, israel would have been filthy rich from the oil, rich enough to buy public opinion (or rather, buy enough news outlets to make them less anti semetic in their lies)

on Apr 14, 2009

The current definition of a terrorist appears to be a returning veteran having difficulty re-integrating into society.

on Apr 14, 2009

The current definition of a terrorist appears to be a returning veteran having difficulty re-integrating into society.

While having his contractual medical compensation cut because his government beleives him to be evil for having been injured in a war they send him to.

on Apr 15, 2009

When is the US withdrawing from its occupied territory?

Never mind the US.

I still demand that the Arabs withdraw from North-Africa, Sudan, Assyria, and Kurdistan.

And Saudi-Arabia must withdraw from Hejaz!

The occupation of Islamic holy cities must end now.

 

on Apr 15, 2009

"Israel is "very unlikely" to cooperate with a UN agency's probe into whether Israel and Hamas committed war crimes in the IDF's recent Gaza offensive, a government official said Wednesday.

Hamas, meanwhile, said it was ready to work with the investigators, to be led by Richard Goldstone, a South African judge who served as chief UN prosecutor of war crimes in Yugoslavia and Rwanda."

From J-post.com

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1239710696285

 

Why is righteous Mr. Saito very unlikely to cooporate with the police while evil Mr. Suzuki is ready to work with it?

on Apr 15, 2009

because, as we explained and you keep ignoring, the "police" are self appointed, corrupt, rapists, theives, and murderers who are ineffective bigots on a witch hunt who have never, ever, done anything good.

Also hamas never cooperates, it just always makes STATEMENTS saying it WILL. Who cares what STATEMENT they made, they never actually follow through on any of their promises, agreements, or statements.

on Apr 15, 2009

> because, as we explained and you keep ignoring, the "police" are self appointed, corrupt, rapists, theives, and murderers who are ineffective bigots on a witch hunt who have never, ever, done anything good.

Hey, are there any countries whose soldiers never rape or muder anyone and rob anything? If you believe the soldiers of your country never do crazy things, you are too innocent, Simple Simon.

The reason I ignore you is that your comments are worthy of little attention.

on Apr 15, 2009

Hey, are there any countries whose soldiers never rape or muder anyone and rob anything?

There are where it is extremely rare because it is illegal and punished harshly, the UN on the other hand gives total immunity to their troops who do so.

on Apr 16, 2009

Hey, are there any countries whose soldiers never rape or muder anyone and rob anything?

Yes. It's actually the norm.

Most armies (not Hamas, though) have rules that prohibit such behaviour and prison time (or worse) for offenders.

There are very few organisations that don't. Hamas have and enforce no such rules. And the UN have such rules but don't enforce them. (As Taltamir says, UN troops have immunity.)

 

on Apr 16, 2009

this sort of "rape is normal" argument reminds me alot that one guy who was saying "if someone invaded america, american soldiers would use its civilians as human shields, its called normal tactics".

It never ceases to amaze me how forgiving liberals are of war crimes. And their assumption that everyone comits them. I guess that might have to do with their beleif that guns are evil, ergo all soldiers are pure evil and must thus all equally commit war crimes.

on Apr 16, 2009

this sort of "rape is normal" argument reminds me alot that one guy who was saying "if someone invaded america, american soldiers would use its civilians as human shields, its called normal tactics".

Yes, that was a bit much. I was never that disgusted before. Some people are scum.

 

It never ceases to amaze me how forgiving liberals are of war crimes. And their assumption that everyone comits them. I guess that might have to do with their beleif that guns are evil, ergo all soldiers are pure evil and must thus all equally commit war crimes.

Whatever evil the mind can conceive, the liberal will want to check whether Israel committed it. It doesn't matter how preposterous the accusation or how often similar accusations were proven wrong, Israel must be accused of crimes.

It was a nice eight years when liberals directed some of their hatred at the US and George Bush, it really was. Suddenly somebody else was a possibly candidate for criminal of the decade. But now that Obama is president, it's Israel and Israel and Israel.

Those people will only shut up, for a while, when the Jews get what they deserve. Then they'll be sad for a few years until they find new crimes they can accuse the Jews of.

(Note that I am not referring to people like our Japanese friend but to people like our "human shields are acceptable" friend.)

 

4 Pages1 2 3 4