A Leauki's Writings
Published on April 10, 2009 By Leauki In War on Terror

Many liberals use a different definition of “terrorism” than I do. For them the word is related to a cause, for me it’s related to a method.

Hence for them fighting for the cause they agree with, however inhuman and evil, is not “terrorism” regardless of the methods employed.

And for me attacking civilian targets to create fear (”terror”) is terrorism, regardless of what cause is being fought for.

There simply are not many Jews attacking schools and kindergardens in Arab countries because of real or perceived injustice or suffering experienced. But there are many Arabs who attack schools and kindergardens in Israel (and elsewhere). They are terrorists. They seek to create an atmosphere of terror in order to achieve their political goals (i.e. a Jew-free middle east or whatever their current propaganda officially says it is about).

They are too cowardly to oppose a real army and hence resort only to attacking children and unsuspecting civilians. They murder children in front of their parents, NOT because they expected the children to fire at them or because the children were used as human shields by militants firing at them but SOLELY because the children are too small to fight back and are thus an easy target for even the bravest of Arab terrorists.

And they are not very brave. They are only brave when their enemy is weaker. If the enemy turns out to be stronger, they whine and cry and ask the world for help against the evil Israelis, an enemy who at first seemed like an easy target and turned out to be far more difficult to “throw into the sea” than originally thought.

This is the terrorists’ battle strategy:

1. Try to murder children.
2. Wait for Israeli reaction.
3. Try to murder children until Israel reacts.
4. After Israel responds in kind, cry and whine and ask the world for money.
5. Use the money to buy weapons.
6. Repeat.

What heroes! If only they could take violence like they expect Jews to. But they are lesser men than the Israelis.

(Other typical targets of their heroic allies include unarmed black African tribes. Step 4 works so well as the world has lots of money because the world refuses to give that same money to the victims of genocide committed by the terrorists' allies in Darfur.)

 

 


Comments (Page 2)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Apr 12, 2009

I ask again, would you agree to the Japanese police storming your flat every two weeks on account that you MIGHT have committed a crime and with the explanation that crimes have to be investigated? Would you not think that there is anything odd about being accused of horrible crimes all the time? And would you not think that such an investigation is likely to be a sham when you know that the police was actually actively supporting the people who attacked your flat last week?

I would allow tje police to come to my flat every two weeks if necessary. I have never heard that UN investigators went to Israel every two weeks. I read J-post, Harretz and blogs you introduced to me every day. The news I read every two weeks is "illegal Palestinian house was removed", "Palestinian festival banned" and so on (of course including the news on terrorism, too).

If I were included in a sham crime, I would do my best to clear my reputation and accept the police.

Would you doubt whether anyone who refuses every inspection by police is really innocent?

on Apr 12, 2009
I ask again, would you agree to the Japanese police storming your flat every two weeks on account that you MIGHT have committed a crime and with the explanation that crimes have to be investigated? Would you not think that there is anything odd about being accused of horrible crimes all the time? And would you not think that such an investigation is likely to be a sham when you know that the police was actually actively supporting the people who attacked your flat last week?

 

I would allow tje police to come to my flat every two weeks if necessary. I have never heard that UN investigators went to Israel every two weeks. I read J-post, Harretz and blogs you introduced to me every day. The news I read every two weeks is "illegal Palestinian house was removed", "Palestinian festival banned" and so on (of course including the news on terrorism, too).

If I were included in a sham crime, I would do my best to clear my reputation and accept the police.

Wouldn't you doubt whether anyone who refuses every inspection by police is really innocent?

on Apr 12, 2009

Sorry. I tried to delete comment 16, in which I made a mistake, but couldn't (I have no idea why I cannot delete my own comment now).

on Apr 12, 2009

taltamir


 
fussyvetreply 9Then, what/whom does someone in their right mind trust? I'm just curious.
Anyone who says "I want to kill all <people>", beleive him that he really does want to kill <people>. Hamas openly states that their goal is not peace, but the death and elimination of all jews in the region and the destruction of israel. That is their official goal.
 

 

I intended to ask comment 8.

And I asked "what/whom does someone in their right mind trust"? Is Hamas in their right mind? If you think so, the answer is right while I don't think Hamas is in their right mind.

on Apr 12, 2009

And I asked "what/whom does someone in their right mind trust"? Is Hamas in their right mind? If you think so, the answer is right while I don't think Hamas is in their right mind.

I think you are failing to correctly use basic english grammar to convey your meanings. Wether the hamas is of right mind is irrelevant because the question (and my reply) was weather a person of right mind can beleive the hamas (when they say they wish to kill everyone and not peace). The subject and the object are different.

After which you further go on suggesting that the hamas is SO INSANE that they cannot POSSIBLY mean to kill whom they SAY they wish to kill... because insane people never kill anyone?

on Apr 12, 2009

OK, OK. It's confusing. I think a part of Hamas members really want to kill all the Israeli.

I was just curious about the man who asked, "Does anyone in their right mind trust UN?", and wanted to ask him.

on Apr 13, 2009

I would allow the police to come to my flat every two weeks if necessary.

In Europe and the US we have laws against that much government supervision. The police need a better reason to come to my flat than "he's a Jew".

If there ever was evidence that Israel has committed war crimes like, for example, Sudan, I wouldn't mind the UN going to Israel to investigate. But it's getting ridiculous when the accusations are simply the default after every war Israel fights.

 

I have never heard that UN investigators went to Israel every two weeks.

They don't. UN officials are permanently installed in Israel. You cannot cross a street in Jerusalem without seeing UN-marked trucks.

 

I read J-post, Harretz and blogs you introduced to me every day. The news I read every two weeks is "illegal Palestinian house was removed", "Palestinian festival banned" and so on (of course including the news on terrorism, too).

It will take a while for the world to understand that being an Arab is not an excuse to build a house without a permit. Jews can't do it either, but it's not news when a Jew follows the law.

 

If I were included in a sham crime, I would do my best to clear my reputation and accept the police.

If the police were interested in facts that might be possible. But if the police are known for accusing you of every crime possible all the time without any evidence, letting them into your house will just tell the world that you agree with the need to search your place.

 

Wouldn't you doubt whether anyone who refuses every inspection by police is really innocent?

No. Not allowing the police to search your house has nothing to do with being innocent or not.

But if I had two neighbours, Miller and Goldberg, and Miller keeps screaming "death to Goldberg" and shoots at Goldberg's door every day, I would find it extremely odd if the pollce searched Goldberg's house whenever Goldberg shoots back rather than Miller's when it starts.

 

on Apr 13, 2009

OK, OK. It's confusing. I think a part of Hamas members really want to kill all the Israeli.

Not a part, the lot. It's in Hamas' charta. That's their purpose.

And it's not only Israelis, it's all Jews everywhere.

They do not differentiate between "evil" Jews and "good" Jews like western liberals do. They hate both middle-eastern and European/American Jews.

 

on Apr 13, 2009

fussyvet
OK, OK. It's confusing. I think a part of Hamas members really want to kill all the Israeli.

I was just curious about the man who asked, "Does anyone in their right mind trust UN?", and wanted to ask him.

thats like saying "part of the nazies want to kill the jews" or "part of the KKK want to kill blacks"... The hamas MOTTO is "drive the jews into the sea", the hamas one and ONLY stated goal is the destruction of israel and killing of all the jews... Just like the KKK's is openly against blacks, and that is in fact its core principle... Actually the hamas is moreso than the KKK because the hamas actually has a written goal, last I checked the KKK did not have orginized documentation.

Is it possible that there was a person who was born to a family where everyone is a member of the KKK, where that person does not beleive in it, but he doesn't have the courage to stand up to his family? yes... But that is a RARE thing. An organization explicitly stating the destruction of a race should be beleived that it really wants it, and all or at the very least almost all its members should be viewed as supporting that...

And what do you mean "complicated" its simple basic english, I am not a native english speaker and I get this.

It will take a while for the world to understand that being an Arab is not an excuse to build a house without a permit. Jews can't do it either, but it's not news when a Jew follows the law.

Only in the most extreme cases do illegally built houses of arabs get removed, because its such a big deal in international news, only jews pay taxes and get permits, arabs don't. But on occasion they build something so unsafe or in such a place that it HAS to be removed... and of course its all over the news... Because for some reason its evil to require all citizens of a country to obey basic zoning regulations regardless of their race, [sarcasm]only jews and christians and atheists and hindues and beduin and the myrid others should be required to obey zoning regulations, muslims must be allowed to build whatever they want without permits[/sarcasm]

on Apr 13, 2009

let us not forget that the "police" in question (UN) has a history of embezzling food donation funds, raping children with impunity, and aiding terrorists.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/081zxelz.asp

See, the UN has NOBODY watching over it, furthermore the UN has TOTAL immunity in any country it operates in. So when UN soldiers rape little children in congo (for example) refugee camps, the local authorities can't do anything because the UN operatives are granted un immunity. Then the UN tries to cover it up, and when it finall blows up they "suspend" a few people... There is no court that could actually do anything, its just an internal un investigation... maybe they will fire someone.

Various U.N. reports and interviews with humanitarian groups suggest that international peacekeeping missions are creating a predatory sexual culture among vulnerable refugees--from relief workers who demand sexual favors in exchange for food to U.N. troops who rape women at gunpoint.

Allegations of sexual abuse or misconduct by U.N. staff stretch back at least a decade, to operations in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea. A 2001 report, released by the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and Save the Children, found that sexual violence against refugees in West Africa was endemic (though some of its findings were denied by a subsequent U.N. team). A year later a coalition of religious organizations sent a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell urging the United States to send more human rights monitors into Congo. The U.N. then introduced a "code of conduct" to help prevent future abuses, including prohibitions against sexual activity between staff and children and the exchange of money or food for sex.

Thats right... the UN staff is now officially no longer allowed to have sex with CHILDREN... i guess raping adults is still fine though.

Almost a year after the MONUC office in Kindu sent a memo in August 2003 to its headquarters in Kinshasa, detailing suspicions of sexual exploitation, the London Independentdiscovered action still hadn't been taken.

Who are we kidding though... "investigation" is code word for get the fuck off my lawn I aint doing anything. The UN isn't investigating anything, all the scumbags in the UN get away with rape.

Indeed, the international operation in Bunia, home to about 16,000 refugees, threatens to become another monument to U.N. paralysis and failure. Investigators describe a "significant, widespread and ongoing" pattern of abuse at the camp--an astonishing conclusion given that many women are afraid to report sexual violence against them. At least one senior official in charge of security in Bunia is implicated in the scandal, and U.N. peacekeepers allegedly have threatened investigators with retaliation. According to the Economist, a U.N. probe is even considering the possibility that MONUC has been infiltrated by "organized pedophiles who recruit their friends."

on Apr 13, 2009



But if I had two neighbours, Miller and Goldberg, and Miller keeps screaming "death to Goldberg" and shoots at Goldberg's door every day, I would find it extremely odd if the pollce searched Goldberg's house whenever Goldberg shoots back rather than Miller's when it starts.
 

 

     The setting is not right. If I had two neighbours, Suzuki and Saito, and Suzuki keeps screaming "death to Saito" and shoots at Saito's door every day. Their neighbours know well about both of them. Some of the neighbours cooperate with Suzuki, some stop him from smuggling weapons and the other one, who has the biggest power in the region, cooperate with Saito. I would find it extremely odd if the police did not search the place where Suzuki and his family were shot and Saito did not allow the police to come in the place.

on Apr 13, 2009

not only is your analogy bullshit fussyvet, you also managed to mix up the names you made up.

on Apr 13, 2009

If I had two neighbours, Suzuki and Saito, and Suzuki keeps screaming "death to Saito" and shoots at Saito's door every day. Their neighbours know well about both of them. Some of the neighbours cooperate with Suzuki, some stop him from smuggling weapons and the other one, who has the biggest power in the region, cooperate with Saito. I would find it extremely odd if the police did not search the place where Suzuki and his family were shot and Saito did not allow the police to come in the place.

Did the police search Suzuki's place to find out if one of Suzuki's own family killed Mr Suzuki or did the police immediately assume that it must have been Saito?

Also remember that most of the neighbours used to join Suzuki in his insane war against the Saito family.

Plus there used to be Mr Toshiba from the other side of the road, who murdered ALL of the Suzuki's cousins on his side of the road and is still considered a hero by the Suzuki family and most of the other people living in the house.

The biggest power in the region cooperates with Saito, but has only done so for a short time and for some reason tries to be "balanced" all the time, asking Mr Saito please to open the door when the Suzuki family complain that they cannot shoot Saito's children with the door closed.

And the major complaint the police have is that Mr Saito keeps his door closed when being shot at. Plus they condemn the Saito family for not giving free money to the Suzuki family all the time. (Mr Saito already pays the Suzuki family's medical bills and is regularly shot at when he brings over the money.)

Of course there is a back story where the apartments once belonged to Mr Suzuki, and before that to Mr Mitsubishi, and before that to Mr Saito, and after Mr Suzuki they belonged to Mr Turkish Guy and after that to some English dude. All the other apartments in the street are owned by the Suzuki family, who keep the former inhabitants as slaves. Mr Sudanshi and Mr Irakishi (Mr Suzuki's cousins) were the worst perpetrators.

The police hears about it.

Mr Suzuki wants to kill the Saito family and can't because the Saito family keep their door closed.

Mr Saito occasionally shoots back and is a much better shot.

Mr Saito's cousin, Mr Sudanshi, is accused of murdering everyone in the three apartment on his floor and enslaving the people on the floor below. People are FLEEING his part of the house, some to the Saito's apartment, which already houses refugees from all the other apartments.

In the buildings on both sides of the street members of the greater Suzuki family murder and enslave everybody else, except the Saito family who shoot back. And they murder each other. In fact Mr Algarishi (another cousin of Mr Suzuki's) has managed to somehow to end up with one third of his family dead one evening, with no external influence whatsoever.

Mrs Saito complains that she has heard that Mr Saito occasionally murders his own children, and indeed there are often children missing with no explanation.

So the police decide to raid Mr Saito's apartment every two weeks.

And there is nothing wrong with the scenario?

 

 

on Apr 13, 2009

not only is your analogy bullshit fussyvet, you also managed to mix up the names you made up.

Actually, it's all right.

Except that not all of Mr Suzuki's family was shot but only three or so of the 19-year old troublemakers. And Mr Suzuki claims they were shot by Mr Saito and Mr Saito claims they were shot by Mr Suzuki.

NORMALLY the police would investigate both claims.

IN REAL LIFE, if the UN is the police, the police will only investigate the claim against the Jew.

 

on Apr 13, 2009

yea i see now, she didn't confuse the names because she was simply not telling the whole story, she wasn't make an abstract but simply renaming israel and palastinians and then perpetuating blood liabel.

We were supposed to GUESS as you did that suzukis family was murdered (by the saitos), because there is no indication of that ever happening her story...

However if going ONLY by the story then there is no mention of suzuki's family being murdered in the saitos residence or by the saitos or whatever (its not clear within that story).

Honestly I would be much more concerned about the "police" in question as my little post about the un indicated... since the police come they don't actually investigate anything but just rape random little girls in the neighborhood, steal, and join in the shooting.

4 Pages1 2 3 4