This is a continuation of a discussion in https://forums.joeuser.com/341995.
Who's forcing their definition upon anyone....what is, is...Sacred Scripture and history give the origin and use of the term, not this Christian.
When I say that I don't care about Christians forcing their definitions on a people I include definitions that originate from the Christians' "sacred scripture".
Hebrew (Eber) meant originally a stranger, a foreigner. The first person so designated in Scripture Gen. 14:13, was Abraham, forefather of the Isrealites, who was not a Jew because he was a foreigner in Canaan, who had come from the other side of "the great river" Euphrates. The name was later given to the language of Canaan, Is. 19:18, and was applied to "Jews" who spoke the "holy language" in contrast to the Hellenistic "Jews" who spoke in Greek only.
The root Ayin Bet Resh means "cross", not "stranger". The Hebrew root for "stranger" (and "invader") is Pey Lamed Sin (hence "Philistia" and ultimately "Palestine").
Abraham was obviously not a Jew since he was not one of the descendants of his grand son Juda (something like that happened once in the Muppet Show, I think). And of course he was a foreigner in Canaan who had _crossed_ the Jordan. (Canaan derives from the root Kaf Nun Ayin which means "low" compared with Resh Mem with means "high".)
The language of Canaan was Phoenician. Hebrew was a dialect of the Canaanite language and eventually absorbed many Egyptian and Aramaeic (from the highlands) loan words. (For example, the Hebrew words for "mother" and "father" are Aramaic loans, as is the word for "chair".)
I don't know about non-Greek-speaking Jews being called "Hebrews". I don't see why they would have been called that given that they smoke Aramaic whereas both Greek- and Aramaic-speaking Jews used Hebrew as a liturgical language.
The great river Euphrates is not that great up in the mountains were Abraham came from.