"The famous dialogue that took place between the king and his messenger is very short and very revealing. The king, we are told, exclaimed, 'Ce'est une revolte', and Liancourt corrected him: 'Non, Sire, ce'est une revolution.'"
I read today that Mousavi is "prepared for Martyrdom" or somesuch, and that there was a suicide bombing at a major revolutionary monument that killed three other people. I suspect things are going to get ugly shortly.
The suicide bombing was unrelated. It was probably a member of the "People's Mujahedeen", a Sunni Arab terrorist group fighting the Shiite government of Iran. Their cause is valid, but their methods are not. They just used the opportunity to add their bit. (They certainly want reform.)
But don't confuse them with the protesters. Iran is not like Iraq, where both sides resort to terrorist tactics. Those attacks on Shia sites happen a lot in Iran, the media rarely comment.
Mousavi is "prepared for Martyrdom" because he has gone too far. He knows he will likely die if he loses. He is right. He would be a martyr. He would indeed die for a good cause. I think it is time we all recognise Mousavi, the opportunist, for the hero he has undoubtedly become in the last two weeks. When this ends and he wins, I think he should get the Nobel Peace Price. This revolution, if it becomes one, will ultimately create peace in the middle east.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/iran/2009/06/090621_ag_street_clashes.shtml
Police are fleeing.
If I saw that kind of mob bearing down on me, I'd tail it too!
Pfft, no doubt; I'd be like, "Okay guys, you know...I've been thinking about a career change and now seems the best time...."
I found this tweet coming from a supporter of Ahmadinejad's power grab:
http://twitter.com/antifacista203
Apparently the supporters of the Holocaust-denying dwarf think of themselves as "anti-fascists".
Iran coup is Bushs plan. Obama shuts up because he knows.
I'm thinking the guy is American, not Iranian.
Anyway, in the mean time I have heard reports (and seen a possible video) that the Basij (Khameini's bully militia) headquarters has been blown up. Apparently somebody set fire to the gas pipe.
Foreign governments controlling TWITTER! See how disgusting they act against us and free speech!
Honestly, this habit of using a supposedly censored medium to announce that one is being censored is an American truther habit. That guy is American!
Then there is this:
http://iranelection2009.com/archive/2009/06/23/rafsanjani-poised-outflank-supreme-leader-khamenei
Rafsanjani Poised to Outflank Supreme Leader Khamenei
A source familiar with the thinking of decision-makers in state agencies that have strong ties to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said there is a sense among hardliners that a shoe is about to drop. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani -- Iran’s savviest political operator and an arch-enemy of Ayatollah Khamenei’s -- has kept out of the public spotlight since the rigged June 12 presidential election triggered the political crisis. The widespread belief is that Rafsanjani has been in the holy city of Qom, working to assemble a religious and political coalition to topple the supreme leader and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
This is being hailed as a success for the protesters. But I don't believe it is really good news. It's simply a way for the regime to replace two unwanted leaders and survive. Two months later we'll be back where we were.
While this is good:
Ayatollah Khamenei now has a very big image problem among influential Shi’a clergymen. Over the course of the political crisis, stretching back to the days leading up to the election, Rafsanjani has succeeded in knocking the supreme leader off his pedestal by revealing Ayatollah Khamenei to be a political partisan rather than an above-the-fray spiritual leader.
But this is bad:
Meanwhile, the Al-Arabiya satellite television news channel reported that a "high-ranking" source in Qom confirmed that Rafsanjani has garnered enough support to remove Ayatollah Khamenei, but an announcement is being delayed amid differences on what or who should replace the supreme leader. Some top clerics reportedly want to maintain the post of supreme leader, albeit with someone other than Ayatollah Khamenei occupying the post, while others support the collective leadership approach.
And this is funny:
To a certain degree, hardliners now find themselves caught in a cycle of doom: they must crack down on protesters if they are to have any chance of retaining power, but doing so only causes more and more clerics to align against them.
Naw, that's more of a "generic nutcase" habit. I wonder if he has a tin-foil hat, too.
No, I think it's distinctly American, or rather western (and originally American). The ability to use very modern technology, like the Internet, to complain about that technology being censored is a habit specific to nutters resident in very rich and very free countries. (It also happens a lot that people use their DSL connection to complain about their poverty.)
The tin-foil hat people are those who actually avoid using media that they believe are under government control. They are nutters too, but they are not hypocritical little egoists.
Why did western countries ever recognise the mullah regime in Iran???
Apparently Obama bluntly condemned the crackdown in Iran recently, instead of merely being "troubled". Even brought up the allegations of election fraud. About damn time.
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Obama+condemns+Iranian+crackdown+protests/1724807/story.html
And just a few days ago Obama's apologists told us that this would be a mistake and that Obama is smart enough to avoid it.
Well, he finally made the mistake. Good for him.
He's even smarter than that.
Turns out the Iranian government didn't know quite as much about their own country that claimed to know about "Palestine".
There are now four distinct movements or groups in Iran. This is not just "people against mullahs".
Group 1: "Ayatollah" Khomeini, "president" Ahmadinejad, the revolutionary guards, the Basij militia, and a few violent ayatollahs, basically the secular part of the current regime. This group has been trying to take power away from "the mullahs" and reserve it for Khameini himself and the revolutionary guards since 2005. They are strictly against any reforms.
Group 2: Former president ayatollah Rafsanjani (Iran's Goebells), most other mullahs, the clerical part of the current regime. They have been losing power to group 1 since 2005 and are trying to use the current events to get it back. They are willing to reform the system to preserve it. Some are genuinely interested in a reformed system.
Group 3: Mousavi and his supporters. They want reform, Mousavi himself within, some without the current system. They are the "death to Ahmdinejad" crowd.
Group 4: The rebels. They want the system itself to go away. They are the "death to Khameini" crowd.
Group 3 can win with the help of group 2.
Group 4 can win with the help of group 3, but only if they don't rely on group 2.
Group 1 can win with the help of group 4, namely if group 1 wins the street battles.
Group 2 will very likely win, no matter what. If not, they will wait untuil group 1 make another mistake, unless group 1 find a good tool against group 2.
Things to look out for:
1. Expect more street violence (and even less news reports about it). Expect more harsh words coming from group 1 designed to keep the violence (against the protesters) going.
2. Expect purges among the clerics. Group 1 has to get rid of group 2.
I am hearing ever more reports of militia men speaking with Arabic accents.
I am wondering why the regime uses Arab militias (Hizbullah and Hamas, no doubt).
Are they running out of Iranian security personnel?
Do they have reason to believe that they cannot use Iranian security personnel?
Or did those groups simply decide to help the regime with the regime tolerating the help?
From Twitter:
Pls if u do nothing else ,make sure George Galloway know that the millions of us hre think he is a fool
Fascist MP George Galloway didn't suddenly change sides like so many Hizbullah supporters of 2006. I always admired his certain type of honesty.
