A Leauki's Writings
Published on August 5, 2007 By Leauki In OS Wars
I run Windows XP on my MacBook using Parallels Desktop.

I arrived at the University of Haifa yesterday and started using the local wireless network with Mac OS. Today I thought I could try it with Windows as well.

I started up Windows XP which was configured to use my home network, of course. I use fixed IPs at home. In Mac OS I can change the network location and leave my home network configuration alone. So I figured I could set up a new connection in Windows to avoid having to modify my finely tuned existing network connection.

I disabled the network connection and started the "Create a new connection" wizard.

The wizard asked me some questions and then claimed that it needed a reboot to set up the connection. (Why?)

After the reboot the only connection object I found was the disabled existing connection object. The wizard hadn't done anything, o so it seemed. Still unable to connect to the Internet Windows XP announced that the computer's hardware had changed considerably (and this is Windows running in a VIRTUAL MACHINE that certainly didn't change) and needed to be re-activated.

I believe the wizard made Windows believe that the hardware changed, although it left the network settings alone.

After a few reboots I convinced Windows to connect to the Internet using my (now modified) existing network connection object. My home network settings are lost, but at least I could activate Windows over the Internet.

Windows annoying features:

1. No network locations and the ability to switch between them.

2. Network connection wizard does not create a new connection object.

3. Windows needs to be activates and re-activated, which, since it tracks hardware changes will always add itself as one further problem to whatever existing problem caused the hardware change.

Mac OS advantages:

1. Supports network locations.

2. Does not requir a network connection wizard. A new location will always default to DHCP and existing network locations keep their settings.

3. Does not require activation, not even when the system thinks that the user doesn't have enough annoying problems to deal with.

I know, I know, Windows is great and has so many advantages over Mac OS, but none of Windows' advantages are particularly helpful if one simply wants to connect to the Internet and read email.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 08, 2007

I have 25.

Yes, but you, too won't know what to do with them....as you are Windows-centric, not a Mac-fanatic....

Leauki ....I'm glad you don't like Windows.  If the OS won't play nice for you on your MacBook well I guess that clearly reinforces your choice of a MacBook.  Heaven forbid you actually ran the OS NATIVELY on a system intended for it and thus were confident of a fair and legitimate basis for comparative research.

But I digress.  This is sourced from JU, where everyone seems to have an ego and an attitude.  State an opinion.  Call it fact.  Deny validity of contrary argument.  Most of all, be controversial.

Running an OS within a VM adds another layer for potential performance issue, so the performance of the Win OS is disadvantaged over that of the native OS.

Compare them fairly.

Fire up a box with WIN....and a second with Mac.  Anything less is guaranteed prejudicial....

 

on Sep 01, 2007

Did you WANT any help here, or were you looking to argue? I can tell ya right now, the people here will bore quickly of insults!


What insults???


If the OS won't play nice for you on your MacBook well I guess that clearly reinforces your choice of a MacBook. Heaven forbid you actually ran the OS NATIVELY on a system intended for it and thus were confident of a fair and legitimate basis for comparative research.


What do you mean "comparative research"? I just installed the damn thing and found that it lacked a feature I needed. The feature exists neither when run in a VM nor when run on "native" hardware. (Although why a random PC would be more "native" than the highly standardized Mac I do not know. The hardware is mostly the same and Apple provide all the drivers. In fact Sony laptops have more problems with Windows than Apple laptops.)


Running an OS within a VM adds another layer for potential performance issue, so the performance of the Win OS is disadvantaged over that of the native OS.

Compare them fairly.

Fire up a box with WIN....and a second with Mac. Anything less is guaranteed prejudicial....


You don't get it. This was not a comparison for some article. It was a MISSING FEATURE. The performance of Windows was excellent, it was the missing feature that was annoying.

And that feature simply doesn't exist on Windows XP, not in a VM, not on a Dell PC (which I use at work, now with Vista). It has NOTHING to do with "performance issues".

Some facts:

1. If an operating system doesn't include a certain feature running it on another type of computer won't make the feature appear. It needs to be implemented first. (This particular feature is missing in Windows XP and is missing independently of where XP is run.)

2. Running a VM or several of them does NOT make an expert on virtualisation technology and its advantages or drawbacks. (Parallels Desktop creates a VM that is a PC. That's the point of the Intel hypervisor technology Parallels uses. Windows XP runs on the VM just like it runs on real hardware and cannot tell the difference.)

3. Buying two computers and installing two operating systems on them just to confirm that a missing feature of Windows XP is also missing on the second computer is idiotic, especially when done because somebody thinks that the missing feature is a "performance" issue.

4. Windows XP's performance in Parallels is excellent and the missing feature in XP would not appear if the performance would be better.

Anything still unclear?


on Sep 01, 2007
Blah Blah Blah yakedy Schmakedy.....
on Sep 01, 2007

But I digress. This is sourced from JU, where everyone seems to have an ego and an attitude. State an opinion. Call it fact. Deny validity of contrary argument. Most of all, be controversial.

About covers it....

on Sep 01, 2007
on Sep 01, 2007
Quite topic unrelated tip, but to people that have to switch between different networks often : Mobile Net Switch saves me a lot of hassle when traveling and switching to different networks in our different companies (even for connecting different network adapters and network-drives) and at the hotel for example. No reboots neccessary. With windows, You just have to know where to find the good tools that can handle missing features.
2 Pages1 2